BBC - Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke ~ Daily News

Wednesday, April 28, 2021

BBC - Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke

152 pages : 25 cm. Discusses the history and ramifications of the Supreme Court decision which addressed the issue of affirmative action. Includes bibliographical references (page 145) and index. Discrimination in early America -- New targets of discrimination -- Separate but equal -- Bakke applies...Bakke v. Regents of University of Cal., 18 Cal. Bakke then filed suit in the Superior Court of California, seeking an injunction to allow him into the medical school claiming that the school had discriminated against him on the basis of his race and thus violated his rights under the Equal...Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. There was no single majority opinion. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Only RUB 193.34/month. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Bakke had good recommendations, G.P.A., and scores on the MCAT admissions test but was rejected in 1973 and 1974.at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law I. Standardized Objective Criteria Should not Form the Basis of Comparison for Majority and Minority Candidates A. Standardized tests are not reliable predictors of future academic or professional success and are culturally biased against...

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

Source for information on Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed. dictionary. Bakke had twice been rejected by the medical school, even though he had a higher grade point average than a number of minority candidates who were admitted.Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.The California Supreme Court ordered the school, the State-run University of California, to admit Bakke. Allan Bakke filed suit after learning that minority candidates with lower qualifications had been admitted to medical school under a program that reserved spaces for ?disadvantaged? applicants.Allan Bakke, a white male, applied to the University of California - Davis Medical School and was denied admission despite being well qualified. The UC Davis Medical School had opened 10 years earlier in 1968 with a entering class of 50 students.

Study Regents of the University of California v. Bakke... | Quizlet

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 438 U.S. 265. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. No. 7811 Argued: October 12, 1977 --- Decided: June 28, 1978. The Medical School of the University of California at Davis (hereinafter Davis)...Bakke filed suit, arguing that the university's quota system for minority students violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The United States Supreme Court took up the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438...The University of California, Davis Medical School reserved 16 spots out of the 100 in any given class for "disadvantaged minorities." It is important to note that in Bakke, the Court did not technically hold the special admissions program unconstitutional. J. Stevens and the three other Justices joining...Regent of Univerity of California v. Allan Bakke (1978) var en milepælag, der blev beluttet af De Forenede tater højeteret. Hovedspørgsmål: Overtrådte University of California den 14. ændringsforslag om lige beskyttelse og Civil Rights Act fra 1964 ved at udøve en bekræftende politik...Allan Bakke, a white male, was denied admission to the University of California Medical School. Following his second denial Bakke challenged the constitutionality of the Medical School's special admissions program claiming the program created a racial barrier to enrolment in a publicly funded...

Law School Case Brief

Rule:

In view of the transparent legislative intent, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000d, should be held to proscribe best the ones racial classifications that may violate the Equal Protection Clause or the U.S. Const. amend. V.

Facts:

A white male who were denied admission to the scientific college at the University of California at Davis for two consecutive years, instituted an motion for declaratory and injunctive reduction towards the Regents of the University in the Superior Court of Yolo County, California, alleging the invalidity--under the equivalent protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a provision of the California Constitution, and the proscription in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USCS 2000d et seq.) towards racial discrimination in any program receiving federal financial assistance--of the medical faculty's special admissions program beneath which most effective deprived contributors of positive minority races had been regarded as for 16 of the 100 places in every 12 months's elegance.

Issue:

Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equivalent protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Answer:

Yes.

Conclusion:

The Court affirmed the conserving that the University's special admissions program was once unlawful and the order that the respondent, Bakke, be admitted to the clinical faculty. The Court reversed that section of the judgment enjoining the University from any attention of race in its admissions procedure. Race may well be considered in admissions if it used to be factored in with other traits in a competitive procedure.

Access the full text case Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out at no cost. Be Sure You're Prepared for Class